Web Application & SaaS Review
Hands-on review for the apps and APIs your business depends on.
A practical, manual review of web applications and their APIs against the OWASP Top 10, OWASP ASVS, and modern attack patterns. Built for product teams who need a careful read by an engineer who actually ships software — not a 200-page deliverable nobody opens.
Scope
What we test.
- Authentication, session, and identity flows (incl. SSO/OAuth/SAML)
- Authorization & multi-tenant isolation, IDOR, privilege escalation
- Business logic abuse and race conditions
- Injection (SQL, NoSQL, OS, template, header, log, prompt)
- Client-side: XSS, CSRF, CORS, CSP bypasses, postMessage abuse
- Server-side request forgery, deserialization, file upload chains
- API surface (REST/GraphQL) — schema, rate limit, mass assignment
- Third-party SaaS, supply chain, and CI/CD pipeline exposure
Methodology
How we work.
OWASP-driven, tailored
We start from OWASP ASVS and WSTG as the floor, then layer chained-exploit playbooks specific to your stack.
Manual verification, always
Every finding is hand-verified. Reports never include unfiltered scanner noise — only what's actually exploitable in your context.
Threat-model first
Day 1 is a 90-minute architecture session. We test what actually matters to your business, not a generic checklist.
Engineer-to-engineer
You talk to the people who do the work. Findings come with reproduction steps and remediation guidance an engineer can act on.
Deliverables
What you get.
- Executive summary — short, non-technical
- Technical report — full findings with reproduction steps and request/response captures
- Remediation guidance per finding, with references to OWASP ASVS controls where relevant
- Optional re-test pass, scoped separately if you want it
Timeline
Typical engagement.
Phase 01 · Week 0
Scoping & NDA
Architecture review, asset list, rules of engagement, NDA.
Phase 02 · 1–3 weeks
Active analysis
Lead engineer, communication channel agreed in the SoW.
Phase 03 · 1 week
Reporting
Draft → review → final. Executive summary + technical report.
Public references
We work against these.
Open standards we use as the floor for the engagement — not certifications we hold or issue. Findings are tied back to the relevant control IDs so your engineers can defend the remediation in technical reviews.
Our reports are technical hardening guides — not formal audit evidence. Compliance certificates are issued by your accredited auditor, not by us.
Ready to scope it?
The request form takes about three minutes. We respond within one business day.